Recently, Lindy West beached herself long enough to write yet another insane diatribe in a long tradition of endless crazy. Despite the impressive feat of avoiding all that plastic in the ocean on her way in, she was somehow unable to muster the intellectual strength to write any kind of real journalism.
She recently thwub-thwubbed an article called “Teen Girl Raped On Field Trip, Treated Horribly By Seattle High School.” Let our journey begin with the very top of the article, where it’s listed in the category “Rape Rape.” If you’re surprised at the casualness which feminists treat the very real issue of rape, then you still mistakenly believe that feminists support women. As I will demonstrate over and over in this blog, feminism is a war on human happiness that mainly uses hatred of women to accomplish its goal of making everybody miserable.
Anyway, let’s get on with it. Her article begins with this summary: “In November of 2012, a 15-year-old girl was on a two-day school trip to a national park when she was brutally raped by a classmate. She reported it. She was hospitalized. There was an investigation. Her alleged rapist returned to school. She never did.“
This strikes me as the equivalent of, “A murder was investigated, and then the alleged murderer went free!” Despite having the second-largest brain of all marine mammals, Lindy West was somehow unable to to put these pieces together and realize that there was not enough evidence to prove that he attacked her. That is, after all, how the justice system works. And let’s keep in mind that they have real people who have been actually trained to investigate crimes, unlike the kangaroo courts that cause innocent male students to be expelled from college.
No, despite having real police officers, real investigators, real sheriffs and real forensic labs going over the evidence, Lindy West has decided that he raped her because Lindy West said so. Again, one would think that if feminists cared about women they would never treat a serious topic so lightly, minimizing and cheapening the experience of actual victims.
Of course, what would be the incredibly obvious case–no evidence, so he walks free–in all crimes except rape, must for some unexplained reason mean something completely different in the bizarro world of false justice the feminists have menstruated all over the rest of us.
Alas, Japan could pick up the hunt again and we can’t know if Sea Shepherd will save Lindy West in time, so let’s move on while she can still respond. She avoids addressing the lack of evidence of wrongdoing by instead linking to several other Jezebel articles about how and why feminists believe that colleges mishandle the treatment of rape cases.
She does so in order to draw attention away from her lack of real information, and emotionally prepare the reader to accept the idea that the high school cases are also handled poorly. Of course, she does not go into how these things are connected–because they aren’t–but she wants the reader to be in an emotional state of “rape cases are handled poorly” so that she can push her agenda without facts. Being “handled poorly,” needless to say for Lindy, means anything other than a 100% conviction rate based on accusation alone.
In this way, Lindy West is emotionally grooming her targets–her audience–to accept her dogma. If this sounds like the time I wondered whether feminist leader Amanda Marcotte is a sociopath who manipulates her audience, then you are correct. It seems as if all leaders of feminism hate women and emotionally manipulate them for financial profit and attention.
West continues: “The victim was raped anally, allegedly by a popular athlete. She initially told investigators that a stranger came into her bunk in the middle of the night, because she “didn’t want to get him, a friend, in trouble” (a claim that, of course, was used to discredit her later).“
The first sentence is awfully telling, is it not? In the real-life version of this story, a girl pursued a popular athlete for sex, and at some point they started having anal sex. Interesting how the popular alpha male athletes, the ones all the attractive young women are going out of their way to entice into bed, keep getting accused by the hamster the following day.
From the second sentence, we learn that the girl is a liar. This is no surprise by itself, since I’ve discussed before how science proves that most women are constantly lying about everything. She lied to police, making a story up on that spot (they’re so good at that, aren’t they?). Notice how her excuse at the time was “didn’t want to get her friend in trouble.”
Let’s stop right here. If your friend stabbed you, would you blame it on someone else to protect your friend? Or is it the case that this woman is extremely unstable, lies with ease, and can’t even keep her own lies straight? Of course you would not lie to police to protect your friend, because that person is clearly not your friend.
The last part is even more interesting. From beneath the bowels of her blubbery blowhole, West described the girl’s blatant lie as “a claim that, of course, was used to discredit her later.” The tone in which this sentence was typed suggests that Lindy West believes that you should be able to lie to the police without their growing suspicious of other things you tell them. The phrase “of course” suggests that being suspicious of liars is a common “problem.”
Lindy West, why do you believe that women who lie to the police should be believed by the police? Is your level of narcissistic entitlement really that high that you believe you should literally be allowed to do whatever you want, whenever you want, without regard for anyone else, with literally no consequences ever? Is that the feminist idea of “equality?” That would make more sense than what they claim to want but do not.
But oh my friends and lovers, I am not even close to done with my flensing. The following paragraph is even more telling than anything before it, where we learn that “The athlete’s friend and bunkmate testified that he heard her moaning. “I was never moaning,” she responded. “If I was, then it was in pain.” When asked if he heard her say “No,” her alleged assailant replied, “I did not pay attention to her that much.””
Ho ho! That last sentence is the key to this entire incident, but first let’s examine the testimony. Another person who was in the room testified to police that he heard her moaning. In response, she asserted that she was never moaning, but maybe she was moaning. In this magical mystery hypothetical scenario, if she was moaning which she was never doing, then it was out of pain. I find it interesting that in a hypothetical scenario, she can assert clearly which hypothetical emotion she would have hypothetically been feeling about something that never happened but maybe did.
This builds upon my case that the girl in question is extraordinarily troubled and possibly mentally ill, as so many modern women are. But let’s get the meat of the issue: her alleged rapist, such a close friend that she lied to police in order to defend him, wasn’t really listening to a word she said.
So with these pieces of the puzzle, let’s examine what’s probably happened so far. Young girl wants to fuck a popular athlete. Seeks him out, as many other women surely do, hoping their pussy will be the magical one that tames him and makes him their man. Is so dedicated to pleasing this man that she allows him to have anal sex with her, believing this will separate her in his mind from all those other women and make her special to him.
Meanwhile, it’s so run-of-the-mill for him that he wasn’t even really paying attention to her. Does this sound like her friend, or buyer’s remorse for banging an aloof alpha male who never called back?
We are then told that the girl in question was diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder. Besides the fact that psychiatry is a Nazi mind control scheme, this brings further illumination to my assumption that the girl was mentally unstable all along and perhaps the fact that “her friend” the popular athlete didn’t give a shit about her triggered something. Maybe it was the filing of a false report, lying to police and subsequent closer interrogation that traumatized her. Who knows?
Oh look, shortly afterward we learn that the girl was committed to a residential psychiatric facility. I used to work in a residential psychiatric facility, a lockdown with some of the most violently traumatized teenagers in the state of North Carolina. The kind of children who wind up in those facilities, generally, have undergone years and years of abuse or neglect by their parents.
Understand this clearly: The kids who wind up in residential psychiatric wards ALWAYS come from dysfunctional homes. There is something going on with this girl and her family that we are not being told, and it’s being swept under the rug so that evil feminists can spin the story for their own agenda.
Further, I must explain what kind of people wind up in a psychiatric facility. They are people who literally must be locked and supervised 24/7 because they are such a danger to themselves and others. They have long histories of lying, criminality, self-harm, assault, and a variety of other issues. They are deemed so risky and dangerous that regular therapy won’t work, but they are too young to be in jail or prison. They are never there for just one thing, and it’s dishonest to suggest otherwise.
Lindy West hides this information (or more likely, never bothered to look it up) because she was so determined to write another post in her aforementioned “rape rape!” file. She then reports that the girl’s family, disappointed by the police investigation that didn’t find the man guilty, demanded that the school perform a kangaroo trial so the boy would get in trouble.
Now, of course I have no idea what actually occurred that evening. All I can do is look at everything, who’s reporting on it, how they’re spinning it, and try to connect the dots. What I do know is this:
–Psych facility patients always come from dysfunctional homes
–She pursued him
–She’s a liar
–She was traumatized at some point, but claims to have been thinking perfectly clearly afterward by asserting that she lied for good reason.
What happened between the incident and her being traumatized? I am guessing that feminists did what they do best–convince women that they’ve been raped for their own personal profit–probably including some friends or family. We can’t know for sure, but patterns tend to play out similarly all the time when you know which dots you should look for.
*I’ll admit, I’ve said some cruel things about Lindy West in this article. To make up for it, I’d like to give you the opportunity to Save The Lindies.