Where Successful, Feminism Leads To A Police State

Let us take into account some of the many aims of feminism (and the head of the medusa, liberalism/cultural Marxism itself):

1. To destabilize the nuclear family

2. To control thoughts and indoctrinate citizens in “acceptable thinking”

3. Replace merit-based outcomes with forced equal outcomes

Now, let’s go over how each one requires violence of one kind or another in order to reach its goals. Keep in mind that women will not be committing any of the actual violence, but rather will get men to do it for them (a very common scenario), particularly lawmakers and police officers.

1. The nuclear family is the Northeastern cornerstone of Western Civilization. People naturally want to work out differences and keep the best interests of each other and their children in mind, so feminism went to work taking this apart piece by piece. Firstly, by having laws enacted and selectively reinforced which give women the power to use police violence as a tool to take away a man’s child, home and career should she feel like doing so. There is nothing to stop her, she is often rewarded, and many lawyers help their clients achieve this goal. By giving such an enormous power advantage to one side, the equation was bound to fall apart. This also encourages women to make selfish decisions, despite negative impacts on other people like the men they claim to love and their children with said men.

Without the police force so complicit in their scheme, women would not have such a tempting power play at their disposal and things would be more balanced, the way they are supposed to be. The only way to enforce this outcome is with violence or the threat of violence.

2. “We don’t need no thought control…hey teacher, leave us kids alone!” Schools are the primary indoctrination centers for liberal thought-control, and now feminism uses the law as a form of violence to control the thoughts of all men, and the women who see value in traditional sex roles. Remember when they tried to “Ban Bossy,” one of the dumbest ideas I’ve ever seen that cost millions of our tax dollars to produce and promote? How exactly were they planning on enforcing a ban on words?

The only possible way to do that, again, is through violence or the threat of violence. “Say that word and you’ll go to jail” is the only way, or maybe “you’ll lose your job” (attacking a man’s source of income, and ability to survive, is an extremely violent thing to do. It is essentially trying to make them starve to death because they said something Social Just-tard Warriors didn’t like).

In the near future, there will be words that you are legally not allowed to say too or around women. It began with DongleGate. It isn’t over, not by a long shot.

3. Lastly, and listen carefully, EQUAL OUTCOME WILL NEVER BE THE NATURAL OUTCOME OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY I do not believe that, in their heart of hearts, anyone is dumb enough to really believe anything else. Equal opportunity, which we have now, naturally results in far more inequality than what we have right now–this is why so many special privileges and protections are necessary for so many members of minority groups to be employed, or in school, at the level they’re at. They were not capable of naturally achieving those positions, so “affirmation action” was employed to keep qualified white men out of things they had earned or been born with a talent for, in order to force a more equal outcome. This use of the law to bar qualified men from what is theirs, is another form of violence against a man’s income and ability to live, in favor of making someone who doesn’t belong there feel special.

The fight is not over. We must join hands and raise our voice as one for the side of Truth. We cannot, must not allow this to continue until it reaches the Point of No Return. Have the foresight to see where this is going, look where it’s gone before and realize that things are dangerously close to the exact conditions liberals think they’re protesting–a totalitarian police state that leaves everybody unhappy.

Behind Enemy Lines

I am currently the only conservative in a far-left company. It’s kind of like being Jane Goodall, except the gorillas were intelligent creatures who could articulate well-formed communication…while the far-left fundraisers practice lying for money before they go “educate” the public. They even know they’re lying a fair amount of the time, since the Alinsky strategies they don’t realize they’re using involve moral relativity and a “the ends justify the means” virtue system.

The boss of the organization, a personal friend of mine, is fully aware of my right-leaning thoughts on the environment, politics, sexual dynamics and capitalism. The discussion he had with me when I came in for the job was a special kind of enlightening, as I slowly came to realize just how blind liberals are to their own hypocrisy.

Boss: “You know you can’t talk about your political stuff here, this is an atmosphere of equality.”

Me: “For everyone except me, you mean.”

Boss: “Exactly, we try to cultivate an environment where everyone feels tolerated.”

Me: “As long as they agree with your politics, you mean.”

Boss: “No, like, we want everyone to feel included.”

Me: “How does it make me feel included to tell me I have to suppress my opinions and beliefs at work?”

Boss: “…”

Me: (smiling)

Boss: “Look, if you want to work here just keep it to yourself.”

Then he moved on from the topic, activating his own mental Etch-A-Sketch to avoid acknowledging his casually throwing out everything he claimed to believe in–at the same time as he claimed to believe in it.

They’re fun people to be around, when they aren’t busy talking shit about Republicans and the Koch Brothers (while simultaneously denying the existence and writings of George Soros), the evils of the government (as if they’d be allowed to exist in half the countries of the world), the evils of men (as if anything, ever, literally anything would have ever gotten accomplished without us), and the evils of money (which they spend all day taking from people).

They lose no sleep over this. It fascinates me to no end.

What We Can Learn From Julien Blanc

If you’re either part of this community or just generally watch the news, you’ve probably seen that Julien Blanc (from Real Social Dynamics) was banned from several countries as a result of the feminist left attacking him for some (admittedly crude) videos he published of himself choking random Japanese strangers to get into their pants. The fact that it actually worked has not yet been mentioned in the media; a shame considering that there’s a lot of value to be had in the discussion of how women sexually respond to male sexual aggression / domination. Instead, it’s simply the usual “he’s the devil” rhetoric with no inkling to even peek below the surface. Ah, America–I love you so, and yet your citizens would rather electrically shock themselves than have to think for a few minutes.

No, here at this site our IQ is a tad higher than the norm, so we’ll have a real discussion instead. The real discussion to be had surrounding this issue is fairly simple:

The energy between the sexes is really, really fucked up when men are so confused that they’ll pay huge sums of money just to learn how to have sex with women.

Successully having sex with each other is the sole purpose for which most of our bodies and brains appear to have been designed. Wired deep into the core of our DNA is God knows how many lines of code and instruction for how a man can and should get his penis inside a human vagina. Imagine the disconnect that has occurred to get from there–from nature itself–to the situation we are in today. What could we have possibly fucked up so badly to have males terrified of women and unable to speak with them, and women completely unable to attract and keep high-value mates?

Neither sex is winning this war, since we’ve been pitted against each other by people who have anything but our best interests in mind. Meanwhile, the wimminz make posters and march topless through the streets, shoving crucifixes (crucifixi?) into their anuses to make points about…something….while the world falls apart around them.

Hope is not lost–not if we can bring this discussion to light and have the intellectual courage to honestly examine the circumstances which led to where we are today. And then, once there, discussing will no longer be enough and we must actively turn the tide through legislation, a rewiring of the education system to remove toxic classes like anything stinking of Gender Studies or similar trash, and replacing such classes with useful information that make people into productive citizens and intelligent human beings. That is the real age of Enlightenment we can begin to move towards, rather than the magical utopia leftists would otherwise find out was never in store for them to begin with.

New Articles on GirlsChase

Here is a link to my big list of articles on GirlsChase, with a little teaser for each one. Three of my articles have been published since I last updated you guys, all near the top of the list. If you aren’t a member of GirlsChase, you should be–the signal:noise ratio is excellent and among the best in this corner of the internet.

The Truth About Sexual Harassment

No matter where you look on the internet, someone right now is posting something about how men need to stop sexually harassing women. It’s about taking up “too much space” on public transportation, or passing a laughably stupid “affirmative consent” law, or maybe even about how we make eye contact too rape-like. Whatever it is, it’s probably going viral.

Enough of this crap, let’s have a little talk about what sexual harassment is. But first, a definition:

Sexual harassment (n.)

a. when a man makes a move on a woman who is not attracted to him

b. a wise and musical panda

Now, early readers of this blog will recall that one of my first-ever posts in the Manosphere was critiquing sexual harassment and enlightening the world on its equivalent, relationship harassment. Yes, I used the panda joke twice. You liked it both times.

But let’s get back to the topic at hand, so I can refresh your memory: sexual harassment is when a man makes a move on a woman who is not attracted to him. Not anything more, and not anything less. Unlike my penis, it’s not an “extension of the patriarchy.”

I’ve often gotten laid with the exact same move at the exact same point in the interaction. However, it doesn’t always work–not even close. Were I to do the exact same thing to three women in one night, the outcomes would be:

Girl 1: Put her hand in my face and shut down immediately

Girl 2: Enjoys that I made the move in such a way, but does not have sex with me

Girl 3: Gets so wet that we fuck less than an hour later

And this is often exactly what happens: you do something a few times until you find someone it works on. I’ve mentioned before that sales is the exact same way, and the analogy serves once again: a typical door-to-door salesman will encounter similar Reds, Yellows and Greens (though generally not with sex involved). One person will slam the door in his face, another will hear him out to be polite, and a third will want to buy halfway through the pitch.

So “sexual harassment” is, in that sense, collateral damage from what an average man must do to get laid. Which brings us quite nicely to my next point:

Men will do whatever we have to in order to get laid.

If we have to talk to 10 or 15 girls before we find one to fuck us, then we will talk to 10 or 15 girls. It’s really that simple. Sexual harassment would cease if women approached men more often, but I don’t live in fantasy land, so that’s not really a possibility worth considering. I do like it when they approach, I imagine all men do.

But the real heart of the issue, the reason I write so many damn articles on the exact same topic, is because many men are very uncalibrated. I go to great lengths trying to teach younger guys how the dating game really works (god knows they don’t listen most of the time) because being uncalibrated both gets them not-laid and upsets the woman. It is crucial to understand female signals (actually that’s the only thing that matters).

In all mammals, sex happens when the female signals for it. Humans are no exception, except that so many male humans (particularly the type with poor or absent father-figures) have no idea what those signals are. Considering that knowledge of these signals is required for our species to propagate and survive, it is clear that what young boys are being shown as role models are actually damaging their ability to live according to their DNA, by filling their minds with useless crap that distracts them from what they need to know. If this is the case for you, I feel you–I had to learn this all myself as well, traveling the country seeking out male role models of various types. Being one’s own father figure is a tough gig that no kid should have.

So the issue is one of being uncalibrated–usually. We cannot avoid the other side of the issue, which is that the vast majority of women will sexually tease weak men in order to get things from them. So those men, who are actually correctly reading the signals but not realizing that women are amoral and solipsistic (and that some of them are very cruel people), make moves that are then called “creepy” only because the woman was faking the interest in the first place.

So it’s on men to recognize signals better, and on women to stop misleading men for personal gain.

The Most Crucial Moment In A New Fling

Assuming you’re smart enough to have gone MGTOW and sworn off of “traditional” relationships with modern American women, you have probably come to the correct conclusion that a never-ending series of fun flings is pretty much as good as it gets for a young American man. As such, you can easily see the importance of knowing how to manage those flings in a way that leaves everyone happy. Remember, there is really no reason to lie to women or mislead them about wanting a relationship. Not one woman from my illustrious past has anything nearing hatred for me, except one who is angry for an unrelated reason from my brief interlude with her.

I have mentioned this before on this blog, as well as in articles on both Return of Kings and GirlsChase: the monogamy ultimatum, and your response to it, is paramount to your sexual success while keeping said success on your terms at all times, or pretty much all times. Time for a brief refresher.

At some point in your new fling, depending on factors such as the strength of your Frame, how often you see her and what kinds of activities you do together, a given new woman will turn in frustration to an ultimatum when none of her more subtle ways to get your investment work. She will say something like (and this will be almost verbatim, since all girls use the same exact script),

“Hey, I was thinking a lot about this and I don’t think I’m ready to keep hooking up with someone who’s still hooking up with other girls.”

Now, the response which serves her agenda is “OK, I’ll see just you from now on.” No. Bad. Don’t do this, your caving on such a huge issue immediately makes you submissive to her. She will happily bang you a couple times before increasing her demands on your time and energy, but will never respect you the same way she did before you gave all your sexual power away.

First is the “good news” if you’re relationship-oriented, and “bad news” if you aren’t: the girl likes you and wants to keep you around. How you interpret it depends on your goals, but there it is. It’s a sign that she likes you a lot.

The only answer you should ever, ever, ever give to this ultimatum is “I totally understand where you’re coming from. I’ve had a great time with you, I think you’re awesome, and if you ever change your mind, my door is open.”

And then you leave. This last step must be carried out swiftly and with conviction.

At this point, she’s thinking “shit, that didn’t work! I’m gonna lose him unless I change my game plan!”

Sometimes it will take her up to two days to figure this out, but you will generally see her come crawling back to you, attraction through the roof and wanting to fuck your brains out, in less than 24 hours–but only if you did the earlier part right by saying it because you meant it, and then walking away without looking back.

Here’s the thing: it doesn’t matter if you’re actually living in sexual abundance at that particular time. Even if she’s the only girl you’re seeing, but you want to retain the freedom to do with your dick whatever you please, you need to pull this maneuver off with the dedication and ease of a man with three other women kicking down his door for the chance to be with him.

Your girl will immediately course-correct, though there is always the unlikely possibility that really is looking for a relationship and might just leave. In my experience, 90% of the time they’re just testing their power over you and much prefer the response I provided you to the typical “ok let’s be boyfriend and girlfriend now” stuff. If you find one who really did want a relationship and would have it no other way, then look on the bright side: you weren’t compatible anyway.

Check Out My New Blog

My new blog, “Voice Of The Patriarchy,” is written from the perspective of the Shadow Patriarch which the extreme left believes to be running the entire world. I’m going to be focusing on that instead of this one, and I’ve also begun writing again for GirlsChase.

See you at my new blog, time to ratchet this up a notch.